General Tandyo Budi Revita has placed Papua among the key priorities of his leadership as Indonesia’s new army chief, pledging that the Indonesian Army will support efforts to address security disturbances while advancing the government’s wider welfare agenda. His remarks came as developments in Maybrat, Southwest Papua, brought renewed attention to military operations, arrests, and the possibility of persuading members of armed groups to abandon violence.
Tandyo made the commitment after President Prabowo Subianto appointed him Chief of Staff of the Indonesian Army, known by its Indonesian abbreviation KSAD, on October 15, 2026. He said the government’s priorities in Papua covered both community welfare and security, indicating that the region’s challenges could not be addressed through a single measure alone.
The statement comes at a sensitive moment. A series of security operations in Maybrat had resulted in reported deaths during armed clashes, followed by the capture of a senior figure identified by the military as Zakarias Fatem. Tandyo referred to developments involving armed-group members who had reportedly surrendered or been detained, saying he hoped such developments would encourage others to return to the Republic of Indonesia.
For the new Army chief, the immediate task is to support security while ensuring that military activities remain within the constitutional framework. His emphasis on welfare alongside security also raises a broader question for Papua: how can the authorities create conditions in which communities feel safe, public services function reliably, and development can continue without disruption?
Papua Becomes a Priority Under Tandyo’s Leadership
A Commitment Announced After His Appointment
On October 15, Tandyo spoke to journalists after his appointment by President Prabowo. His remarks set out an early indication of how he intends to approach the Army’s responsibilities under the current administration.
“I think one of the priorities in resolving the President’s programs is Papua, whether from the perspective of public welfare or security disturbances,” Tandyo said, according to reporting by Tirto and Metro TV.
The statement identified two connected areas of concern. The first is security, including the presence and activities of armed groups in parts of Papua. The second is welfare, encompassing the broader government effort to improve the conditions in which people live and work.
The distinction matters because security incidents can affect more than the immediate area where violence occurs. Fear and instability may disrupt travel, limit access to public services, and complicate the delivery of development programs. Conversely, dependable public services and economic opportunities are important elements of a longer-term effort to establish stability.
Tandyo did not announce a new Papua-specific operation or provide a detailed timetable for future deployments in the remarks reported by the media. Instead, he described Papua as a priority within the government’s existing program and referred to the security developments in Maybrat.
His comments should therefore be understood as a statement of leadership priorities rather than evidence that the security situation has already been resolved.
Constitutional Compliance As a Stated Principle
Tandyo also addressed the legal framework governing the Army’s activities. He said the military would continue to obey the Constitution and the rules established by the state.
“The military is constitutionally compliant. We follow what the Constitution says. Whatever the state establishes in the future, that is what we will follow,” he said, as reported by Metro TV.
The statement provides an important reference point for assessing the Army’s future role in Papua. Security operations take place within a wider legal framework, and public confidence depends not only on whether authorities can respond to threats but also on whether they act within their lawful powers.
For operations involving arrests, that principle includes appropriate treatment of detainees, lawful procedures, and access to the applicable legal process. Where force is used, its necessity and proportionality remain important considerations. These are standards for assessing implementation, not claims that every operation has already been independently evaluated.
A constitutional approach also requires clarity about the different responsibilities of military and civilian institutions. The Army may contribute to security operations, but lasting stability also depends on effective law enforcement, public administration, justice, and community engagement.
Maybrat: A Sequence of Security Developments
Armed Clashes Reported
The developments highlighted by Tandyo followed a series of incidents in Maybrat, in Southwest Papua Province.
On October 9, 2026, Indonesia’s National News Agency ANTARA reported that three people described by the military as members of the Free Papua Movement, or OPM, had died in a clash with Indonesian military personnel in Maybrat. The incident occurred in the area north of Kamat village, in Aifat Timur District, according to the military’s account.
The operation involved personnel from joint military units, including members of the Navy’s Marine Corps. The military said the personnel were conducting a security operation when they came into contact with an armed group associated with OPM’s Sorong Raya command structure.
The three reported fatalities included Manfret Fatem, whom the military identified as an operations commander of the group, and two other members. Indonesian media reported these details, citing official military statements.
Such incidents illustrate the risks confronting security personnel and people living in areas affected by armed activity. They also underline the need for accurate information about events on the ground, including the circumstances of clashes and any effects on nearby communities.
The available reports cited here provide the military’s account of the incident. They do not constitute an independent investigation of every aspect of the encounter.
Zakarias Fatem Detained
A Further Development was Reported Five Days Later
On October 14, personnel from the Indonesian Navy’s Marine Corps detained Zakarias Fatem in Aifat Timur, Maybrat, according to statements by military officials reported the following day. Zakarias was identified by the military as deputy commander of OPM’s Kodap IV Sorong Raya structure.
The Marine Corps said the operation took place at approximately 12.45 a.m. local time. The announcement was attributed to Colonel Rana Karyana, head of the Marine Corps Information Service, while Lieutenant Colonel Laili Nugroho, commander of the Yonif 9 Marine Corps task force, provided further information to journalists.
According to the military’s account, Zakarias subsequently declared that he was returning to the Republic of Indonesia and urged members and sympathizers of the group to surrender, lay down their weapons, and return to the national framework.
Those statements were reported by Indonesian media through military sources. The reported declaration and appeal are relevant to the authorities’ stated objective of encouraging defections from armed groups, although their longer-term effects cannot yet be established from the available information.
Tandyo referred to developments in Maybrat when discussing Papua’s security priorities the next day. He said that members of armed groups had reportedly come down from their positions and been detained over the preceding two to three days. He suggested that the developments could deter others from continuing armed resistance and encourage them to return to Indonesia.
Tandyo did not specify the total number of people involved, their identities, or the precise operations to which he was referring. It would therefore be inaccurate to present his comments as a complete account of all arrests or surrenders in Maybrat during that period.
Tandyo Outlines the Wider Objective
Following his appointment as Army chief, Tandyo linked the latest developments to the government’s broader approach to Papua.
His remarks indicated that security measures were intended to address armed disturbances while the government continued to pursue welfare-related priorities. He also expressed hope that people who remained involved in armed activity would reconsider their position and return to the Republic of Indonesia.
The message was one of continuity in the government’s stated priorities rather than a declaration that the situation had reached a definitive turning point. A single arrest, surrender, or operation cannot by itself establish whether security conditions have improved across Papua.
The significance of the developments will depend on what follows: whether further violence can be prevented, whether residents can conduct their daily activities safely, and whether government services can continue to reach communities affected by insecurity.
Law Enforcement and a Human-Centered Security Approach
Security is not the Only Measure of Progress
Tandyo’s decision to discuss welfare alongside security provides the basis for a broader, human-centered interpretation of his priorities. Although the cited reports do not record him announcing a separate policy under that exact label, his pairing of the two areas points to a need to consider how security activities affect civilian life and long-term development.
Residents experience stability through practical changes. Children need to be able to attend school, health workers need to reach patients, traders need to transport goods, and families need to travel without fear. Public institutions also need to maintain reliable services in areas where insecurity has disrupted normal activities.
A human-centered approach would therefore involve more than the deployment of personnel. It would include protecting civilians, communicating clearly with local communities, responding to reports of harm, and ensuring that lawful procedures are followed when individuals are detained.
It would also require coordination between the military, police, regional administrations, and other relevant institutions. The Army can contribute to a safer environment, but civilian authorities remain central to education, health care, local economic development, and public administration.
This is particularly relevant in geographically challenging areas, where difficult terrain and dispersed settlements can make the delivery of services complicated even in the absence of violence. When insecurity adds further obstacles, coordinated planning becomes more important.
Encouraging People to Leave Armed Groups
Tandyo’s reference to deterrence and returning to Indonesia also highlights the distinction between operations against armed groups and efforts to persuade individuals to abandon violence.
The reported statement by Zakarias Fatem, in which he called on members and sympathizers to surrender and lay down their weapons, could provide an opening for further efforts to reduce armed activity. However, it remains uncertain how widely others will accept the appeal.
Any process encouraging people to leave armed groups would need clear procedures for receiving them, assessing individual circumstances, and determining the applicable legal steps. Clear communication is vital to differentiate between those who surrender, are detained, or are under investigation.
Such distinctions matter both for the integrity of legal proceedings and for public understanding. They help ensure that security developments are reported accurately rather than being reduced to a single narrative of success or failure.
The government’s stated focus on welfare also suggests that efforts to strengthen stability should be connected to opportunities for communities to participate in economic and social life. Where conditions permit, local dialogue and access to public services can complement security measures.
The Army’s Wider Responsibilities Under Prabowo
Papua is not the only issue on Tandyo’s agenda. In his first statements as Army chief, he also pledged to help accelerate strategic programs associated with President Prabowo and Vice President Gibran Rakabuming Raka.
These include the Red and White Village or Urban Ward Cooperatives program, known as KDKMP, the Sekolah Rakyat education initiative, and food security programs. Tandyo said the Army would continue work already under way and help accelerate implementation where it has been assigned a role.
He also said the Army would assist efforts to extinguish forest and land fires, particularly in peatland areas. He pointed to the Army’s wide geographical distribution of personnel as a potential resource for speeding up firefighting support.
These responsibilities demonstrate the range of tasks that can involve the Army beyond conventional defense activities. They also make coordination and the clear definition of institutional responsibilities important, particularly where military support intersects with civilian government programs.
For Papua, the connection between security and development is especially relevant. Infrastructure, food security, education, and local economic activity depend on predictable conditions. At the same time, development projects must be designed around the needs of local communities and implemented by the institutions responsible for them.
What Will Determine Progress in Papua?
Tandyo’s early statement sets out a broad direction, but implementation will be the real test.
First, security operations will need to contribute to a sustained reduction in threats to residents and public services. The number of operations or arrests alone is not enough to measure success. Changes in civilian safety, the frequency of incidents, and the ability of communities to resume ordinary activities are also important indicators.
Second, constitutional compliance must remain central to the conduct of security operations. Clear procedures, responsible use of force, and appropriate legal treatment of detainees are essential to maintaining public confidence.
Third, the government’s welfare agenda needs to translate into accessible services and practical economic opportunities. Development programs are more likely to make a lasting contribution when they respond to local needs and can continue to operate under challenging conditions.
Finally, coordination among the Army, police, regional governments, and community institutions will be important. Security and welfare programs involve different responsibilities, and progress depends on those institutions working together without blurring their respective roles.
These measures provide a more useful basis for assessing the government’s approach than any single incident or public statement.
Conclusion
General Tandyo Budi Revita’s declaration that Papua is a priority for the Indonesian Army places security and public welfare at the center of his early agenda. His remarks followed a sequence of developments in Maybrat, including an October 9 armed clash reported to have killed three people identified by the military as OPM members and the October 14 detention of Zakarias Fatem, who was subsequently reported to have declared his return to Indonesia.
Tandyo has expressed the hope that such developments will encourage others to abandon armed activity. He has also said the Army will operate in accordance with the Constitution. These are statements of intent, and their practical significance will depend on how they are implemented.
The broader challenge is to ensure that security operations contribute to conditions in which communities can live safely, public services can function, and development can continue. That requires lawful action, civilian protection, effective coordination, and sustained attention to welfare.
For Papua, lasting stability cannot be measured solely by military developments. It must also be assessed through the everyday experiences of residents: whether they feel safe, whether their children can attend school, whether health services are accessible, and whether economic opportunities can grow.
Tandyo’s emphasis on both security and welfare provides a framework for pursuing those goals. The next stage will be to turn that commitment into measurable improvements on the ground, while ensuring that constitutional principles remain central to the effort.
Read Also
Humanitarian Approach Brings Six TPNPB OPM Members Back to Indonesia
BIN, TNI and Police Lead Mass Blood Donation in Papua